I think I may be the only person in the United States (and perhaps the world) who is not part of the oil industry but is glad gas prices are soaring.
Here my surely-flawed logic:
Since gas prices are so high - and likely to get higher - as people buy new cars, they will be more likely to opt for the fuel-efficient sedans instead of the gas-guzzling SUVs (why people drove those cars to begin with is beyond me - mostly an indication of how the priorities of the average American are messed up).
And as more people buy these high-mile-per-gallon cars, car makers will be more likely to design their new cars to get better mileage.
This is especially an issue with traditional American-made cars, which care more about speed and power than efficiency and practicality. So, when American car makers make the switch, they will provide competition for foreign car companies. This will, hopefully, cause more people to buy American-made cars.
So this would help the U.S. economy, keep jobs in America, help the environment, save people money, get America’s priorities right, bring gas prices back down and put Arrested Development back on the air! (I don’t know about that last part, but wouldn’t it be great?! It would make the world complete again)
Now, as stated, I’m sure this logic is not airtight. I’m no economist, mechanic or fuel guru. And I realize this process will take years. However, I think the point is clear and I think it’s already happening.
It is becoming less chic to drive the 3-mile-per-gallon Humm-scalade. And while many say the reason is because of the environment, I am doubtful that’s the case. The environment has been around for a long time. The idea of saving the environment and fighting global warming has been around for a long time. No lie! Al Gore neither invented the fight against global warming (P.C. - climate change) nor the Internet.
No, the real reason - which shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone - is money. Americans never change their lifestyles, ideas or morals unless it means more money. And now that all across America, citizens are staring to feel the gas-pump pinch, they are finally starting to realize it may be better to invest in a more fuel-efficient car.
Never mind the hundreds or thousands of dollars they could have been saving over the past decade by driving a car with better gas mileage. Not only would that not have been cool, but what would have been the point? The economy was in great shape! So they had plenty of money to shell out at the Shell station (bad…I know…feel free to groan). But now that things don’t look so great, people are finally starting to be motivated by the only thing that will do it - money.
So, when it comes to high gas prices, I hope they stay high (although it does sicken me that oil companies are making record profits and doing everything they can to make more money - again, money is the most powerful, and sometimes only, motivator). But I hope people will be smarter about their purchases. I hope they permanently reorder their priorities and realize that bigger and badder isn’t always better.
That is all.
Tags: al gore, american-made, arrested development, car, car companies, car makers, climate change, domestic, economy, environment, foreign, fuel, fuel-efficient, gas, gas prices, global warming, high, high gas prices, internet, miles per gallon, mpg, oil, oil companies, prices, sedan, SUV, united states
5 June 2008 at 1:52 pm
You echo the sentiments of a 2005 Wired magazine article. The thought is probably right on … but getting there is something I don’t think we’re ready for as a nation (yet)
http://lifeisacookie.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/time-machine-tuesday/
5 June 2008 at 2:08 pm
keep your fuel economy, I’ll stick with safety. The small fuel efficient cars just won’t protect you like a good old fashioned F150 pickup in a wreck. Show me a Toyota Prius that can stand up to hitting a semi or cow on the road, or anything else for that matter
5 June 2008 at 4:06 pm
I’ll show you a Toyota Tacoma that rolled and is still on the road driving perfectly fine 5 years later, that gets better gas mileage than a F-150, as I own one and spent $120 on a new windshield and walked away unscathed. Do that with a F-150 or GMC 1500 and you have nothing left. You were saying something about a Prius, and the example is pretty poor given being hit by a semi in anything means you’ll be pretty Eff’ed up if not dead.
agreed on oil prices needs to be high. Why doesn’t the federal gas tax exist on a sliding scale? 18cents on every gallon regardless of price? makes no sense. we could be driving on gold highways if it was sliding.
I doubt the Big 3 will figure it out even with higher prices and less demand… cut and paste from an earlier comment I made on the issue…
6 June 2008 at 4:40 am
Hans, try hitting a bull at 65 in your toyota tacoma, I did it with a F150, I walked away, my kids walked away, my granddaughter walked away. I’ve got an uncle that ran off the road in a tacoma, when he got out of the hospital after almost losing a foot, he went back to a ford pickup. As far as the Prius being hit by a semi, if you remember High School Physics, Mass times velocity equals force. The bigger your vehicle, the better chance you will have. I will choose safety over fuel economy everytime
6 June 2008 at 6:14 am
I bought my Tahoe in 2001 when gas was much cheaper. I also pulled a travel trailer with it. No car - foreign or domestic - could have pulled my trailer. I also have children and a dog, so I needed the extra space and seating area that a small car or pick up could not have provided. Now, seven years later, the trailer is gone, the dog has passed away and the children are growing up. I am considering buying a smaller car….but I have no payment and I do not relish the thought of getting a car payment. I like my Tahoe, which get between 16mpg and 18 mpg as a daily driver, I fell safer in it then in a smaller car or econo truck. I live in Atlanta and travel the local highways daily. I have seen firsthand the damage a semi can inflict on a vehicle. Without a doubt, the larger the vehicle the better it will handle an impact by a semi.
I am still weighing the safety factor with the economy factor. I think that I will eventually breakdown and go buy another vehicle. It will have to be used so that I don’t have a payment though. Currently my Tahoe runs fine so I will stickk with it a while longer.
The great thing about living in America is that you can choose to drive whatever you want no matter the cost of fuel.
6 June 2008 at 11:07 am
Maybe a “factor” in choosing safety over economy, should be respecting the semi in the first place. Cut one off, drive in it’s blind spots, drive like an idiot around one, be accepting of Newton’s Law when it plows into you.
If your logic were true, then we should all be driving actual tanks, but then we would not be safe from each other, so then we should upgrade to something larger to be safe?
How many of those accidents we caused by the driver in the car being “preoccupied” with other things; cell phone, makeup, eating, reading, etc. or just being an idiot and not respecting the semi and cut it off?
and just some information from Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
So 92% of fatal accidents and 97% of injury crashes were not semi related? and further about blame of accident…
Hmm, passenger vehicles are 22 times more likely to have alcohol in their system and almost twice as likely to have caused the accident due to “inattention” etc. and finally,
I like this one, passenger vehicle are more likely to hit semi’s than the other way around. Apparently, many people to not apply Newton’s Law when driving.
so honestly, you’re reasoning behind larger being safer doesn’t hold as much statistical evidence as you claim. I safer driver in a compact vehicle is more likely to “drive” away, than a “large vehicle” driver involved with an accident with a semi, due to driver negligence.
Statements of “Bigger is better” often times do not match statistical data to the contrary
6 June 2008 at 1:57 pm
slow down a little, at 65 mph in the F150 I averaged 22 to 25 mpg, depending on hills and wind, but that was with the v6 motor, doesn’t pull trailer real well, it will pull them, just not fast
6 June 2008 at 4:30 pm
glad I turned this Safety vs Economy debate, debatable a post in its own right, as you felt in unnecessary to post my response to, well to yourself?
anywho, oh well
6 June 2008 at 4:33 pm
odd this one went through but the other one did not post even though it said I had “duplicated” my submission ? so I take back the claim of censoring that might have just been a WP issue.
the link was a response i was trying to post here, just expanded a little.
10 June 2008 at 1:30 pm
Hans, some of your stats on truck related accidents make you sound almost like a truck driver, almost, the blood alcohol limit for truck drivers is actually .04%, lower level for professionals. Also, the AAAn did a study several years ago that showed trucks responsible for only 28% of car truck accidents resulting in fatalities, but trucks have a 100% obligation to prevent those accidents. All the things you pointed to as ways to avoid a car-truck accident are true, unfortunately, the fact is that people won’t. They have been taught to rely on the “not my fault” mentality. But the point of my comment was that you would still have a better chance in an accident if you are in a bigger vehicle, especially needed by people who don’t have the common sense to be on the road anyway.
21 June 2008 at 7:19 am
The higher the gas price, the faster we will switch over to alternative energy!
21 June 2008 at 7:39 am
No, we won’t be switching to alternative fuels at all. The enviromentalists won’t allow it. They scream about alternative fuel, but then attempt to block any alternatives. They don’t like nuclear energy because the waste has to be stored someplace. They don’t like hydro-electric because rivers have to be dammed. Solar? The reflection off the panels blinds birds. Wind? Nope, birds fly into the fans. When they are questioned on it, they say “we don’t want that, we want to force conservation.” What they want is to force us back into the stone age.